girl

Thursday, July 21, 2005

He has it wrong...

Mayhew seems to be suggesting that because the audience is savvy/jaded in some way, and can't hear poetry divorced from the ironic tone... it becomes impossible to write sincere poetry, poetry without self-awareness, the wink-wink...


He isn't saying that, but he is. Which raises the question we all worried about at 19, when an undergrad prof first asked us, "How much does the author's intent matter?"


I call triple bullshit on this line of thought. Because the poem I write is the poem I write, even if you can't hear it. The poem you hear is a different poem altogether. Sometimes what you hear is smarter than what I write. We call that luck.


I definitely write poems that are free of irony. I border on sentimental. This is why, when I am feeling ironic or self-aware, I abuse italics so badly. Because the words that aren't in italics, AREN'T in italics! I use exclamation points too!!!!


I mean my punctuation!!! I want my poems to touch you, make you swallow hard.


If you don't believe me, go read some of your ironic poems to a little kid and find out what they really mean.

11 Comments:

Tony said...

My poems are not ironic.

5:00 PM  
Jonathan said...

___

Yeah right.

But seriously, I think if the audience is jaded by anything it's by the persistent irony that never moves out of a narrow emotional range. The solution is not the Louise Gluck woodenness, but a poetry that is both self-aware and emotionally open. Not the kind of irony that denies affect and simply flat-lines. That's ok for a poem or two but quickly becomes old.

Go ahead and be sentimental. That doesn't exclude some self-awareness and intelligence.

6:12 PM  
Laurel said...

I absolutely agree! It;s a challenge to everyone as writers.

But it's also a challenge to us as readers, to shake off habits.

And by "you" I don't mean anyone specific.

Except when I say, "you are the bomb diggity" which could be directed at eaither of you.

6:17 PM  
Jonathan said...

The "bomb diggity"? What's that? I'm not up on the slang of young people nowadays. Is it good or bad? have I been insulted or complimented?

Speaking of little kids, look at Julias's pencil poem. The speaker of the poem is sad, yet the poet is being funny, having a good time writing it. There are two levels going on. You sympathize with the pencil, but you know it's all a joke. Or "Tigers helping the sick." (Tony knows what I'm talking about.)

6:28 PM  
A. D. said...

"Bomb diggity", circa 1995.

9:37 PM  
maria said...

i heart triple bullshit.

10:14 PM  
Tony said...

See, though, "Tigers helping the sick" is funny because it's an unusual juxtaposition--Tigers and sick people. It's also funny because the poem imagines tigers--known to most of us as "ferocious beasts" doing very human things. That's not just funny, but it's kind of touching. If that's "irony" fine, but to say "it's all a joke" downplays the real intelligence and feeling of either poem (tiger or pencil). In these poems the affect is not flattened or affected...it's real. OR Julia is a brilliant ironist who ironizes so stealthily that I just don't pick up on it.

1:14 PM  
barry said...

Help me out.

"the poem I write is the poem I write"

What is the spirit behind this statement? Who is your audience and how, if at all, are you accountible to them.

1:19 PM  
barry said...

er...accountAble

1:21 PM  
Laurel said...

I guess I mean a simple tone. I can't control what you hear, only what I hear as I'm writing. You write for a target audience, and I hope my target audience can hear my poems in a forthright clear way when that's what I want.l But I can't control it, can't force a particular way of listening. I ahve to accept that, but I can't try to please everyone.

Like, if every time I say the word "bone" you giggle becasue it makes you think of hardons, should I not use the word bone?

4:20 PM  
Tony said...

I like to use the word "cock" because it makes me think of chickens.

4:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home